Originally this was because tea was expensive enough that it was almost always a social activity. Some older-style British teapots go with an over-the-cup strainer, even though with orthodox broken you will have more leaves caught then with something like a whole leaf Lapsang Souchong.ģ. Normally this means that there is a built in strainer in the spout, although this is not guaranteed. British teapots are often meant for "orthodox broken" tea. This is why when the teapot became less popular, the alternatives all revolved around this requirement that after 5 minutes the brewed tea must not be in contact with the leaves anymore. British teapots are meant for Assamica teas that can oversteep. But then, what makes a person sufficiently British? What about non-british people trained in Britain or by British potters?įinal cause: to make tea by Western brewing parameters as deemed acceptable by Her Majesty the Queen.Ĭonclusion: clearly impossible to determineĪ British teapot is designed for making the teas that Brits prefer.ġ. How many generations of design should it be separated from a non british design?Įfficient cause: this overlaps with the answer above - should be made by a British person. Many problems here of course: how British should the person be? What does it mean to be "British"? And ultimately all teapot designs stem from the original Chinese designs. This begs the question: what about a teapot fired in another country using same process parameters as a British kiln and using all British raw materials? Endless variations of this question can be posed.įormal cause: The design should be inspired by a traditional British teapot design or determined by a British individual in Britain. If we consider the firing process as a determinant of the material, then the firing should be done in Britain. Often this may not be possible, in which case at least quality attributes of the raw materials should pass some british based acceptance criteria. Material cause: the clay and material used should be of British origin. For a seed, it might be an adult plant for a sailboat, it might be sailing for a ball at the top of a ramp, it might be coming to rest at the bottom. For example, the efficient cause of a table is a carpenter, or a person working as one, and according to Aristotle the efficient cause of a boy is a father.Įnd or purpose (the final cause of a change or movement): A change or movement for the sake of a thing to be what it is. Aristotle says, for example, that the ratio 2:1, and number in general, is the cause of the octave.Īgent (the efficient or moving cause of a change or movement): Consists of things apart from the thing being changed or moved, which interact so as to be an agency of the change or movement. For a table, such might be wood for a statue, such might be bronze or marble.įorm (the formal cause of a change or movement): A change or movement caused by the arrangement, shape, or appearance of the thing changing or moving. Matter (the material cause of a change or movement): The aspect of the change or movement that is determined by the material that composes the moving or changing things. In Physics II.3 and Metaphysics V.2, Aristotle holds that there are four kinds of answers to "why" questions:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |